Seriously butts and penis groups why?
Seriously why in the world do we need a group for buts of nudist women of photogenic penises. What about that is vaguely naturist or nudist. To anyone follows me if those are the kind of groups are what you join you should unfollow me because I will unfollow and block.
Anyone can create a group on any subject that they want. Although I don't agree with the subject matter in a lot of them, I don't have to join them. Those that choose to create and join them must be fulfilling some need. Looking at potential friends groups is one way I use to determine if we have anything in common or if they are just a friend/group collector.
There is enough space here for all of us to exist, having said that, I do believe that overt sexual groups or members should be removed.
Anyone can create a group on any subject that they want. Although I don't agree with the subject matter in a lot of them, I don't have to join them. Those that choose to create and join them must be fulfilling some need. Looking at potential friends groups is one way I use to determine if we have anything in common or if they are just a friend/group collector.There is enough space here for all of us to exist, having said that, I do believe that overt sexual groups or members should be removed.
I didnt say anything about there right or ability to exist. My point is simple if those are the kinds of group you like to join I dont care to have you as a friend on here. Since I am I TRUE nudist not one of the fakers here or one of the nudism is what i say it is folks I am not interested associating with that. I will defend anyone's right to do that what they want since I will do what I want with my naturist belief. its that simple.
Since I am I TRUE nudist not one of the fakers here or one of the nudism is what i say it is folks I am not interested associating with that. I will defend anyone's right to do that what they want since I will do what I want with my naturist belief. its that simple.
You are courageous to defend anyone's right to exist and to do what they want. I'm not sure what qualifies as a true vs. a fake nudist. How you don't associate with the fakers is up to you. I choose to ignore them and am grateful for a community here that speaks with authenticity and integrity. That's true nudism to me.
WOW - telling people what groups are appropriate in YOUR eyes or reap the repercussions of being blocked because you do not approve is rather oppressive in my eyes. TN has thousands of groups you can choose to join or not, but in order to be your friend, I have to get your approval? Well, I just unsubscribed to your group and BLOCKED you. I want no association with YOUR authoritarianism!
As you've wandered off from butts and penises into your study of woman's sexuality, I'll respond accordingly. If your parents indeed named you Lee, I think it's because it's the only thing that sounded like it would rhyme with "free", for that describes you well. Of all your postings over the past years, the biggest thing I've questioned regarding your integrity is that you're a cat person, but even there you've helped my thinking evolve. Maybe cats aren't all evil, even if "dog" is "God" spelled backwards.
I read this Amazon excerpt about your book: "every woman has her own unique sexuality, like a fingerprint, and that women vary more than men in our anatomy, our sexual response mechanisms, and the way our bodies respond to the sexual world." That's exactly along my thinking about male sexuality,: that we each have a unique profile and shouldn't settle for six inches with varying blood flow when we can become aroused and vital in all six feet, give or take a few inches.
And so, such questions about photogenic butts and penises end up serving a purpose afterall. The thread can lead to affirming our unique integrity and beauty, photogenic or not. For your openness and broad perspective, I am your grateful student.
As you've wandered off from butts and penises into your study of woman's sexuality, I'll respond accordingly. If your parents indeed named you Lee, I think it's because it's the only thing that sounded like it would rhyme with "free", for that describes you well. Of all your postings over the past years, the biggest thing I've questioned regarding your integrity is that you're a cat person, but even there you've helped my thinking evolve. Maybe cats aren't all evil, even if "dog" is "God" spelled backwards.I read this Amazon excerpt about your book: "every woman has her own unique sexuality, like a fingerprint, and that women vary more than men in our anatomy, our sexual response mechanisms, and the way our bodies respond to the sexual world." That's exactly along my thinking about male sexuality,: that we each have a unique profile and shouldn't settle for six inches with varying blood flow when we can become aroused and vital in all six feet, give or take a few inches.And so, such questions about photogenic butts and penises end up serving a purpose afterall. The thread can lead to affirming our unique integrity and beauty, photogenic or not. For your openness and broad perspective, I am your grateful student.
SPOT ON!!
Whilst it has nothing per se to do with nudism (some would say lots of what people discuss here doesn't), I do kinda understand where people are coming from in assuming that on a forum where people are likely to be much more open about their bodies than elsewhere, it might be a safe place to ask a question about parts of the body which are normally taboo. That is not to be confused with asking sexual questions, of course, but questions along the lines of "I'm not sure if this is normal/has anyone experienced this" etc or questions of etiquette around things like piercings, as devisive as they may be are in my opinion understandable.
As much as the questions, how the answers are given is important. Encouraging overtly sexual questions would likely be seen as poor form. But sometimes it is important to remember that for someone new to the concept of nudism, whilst everyone should have a modicum of respect and sense about how they conduct themselves on- and offline it can be easy to blunder into saying the wrong thing, or in the wrong way. Someone who has posted and maybe just not realised it could come across differntly to how it was meant will usually be apologetic and appreciate the digression being explained. Someone who is trying to stirr things and get a response will continue to do so.
These groups are no less appropriate in real nudism than all the games in the forum pages. Neither have anything to do with nudism. But, since its not my website, its not my rules. I simply don't read what I don't want to see.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!