This is on point and unfortunately there are people who call themselves nudists and in the name of individual freedom turn a blind leading to the inevitable results we are seeing now. But what does that matter if they are able to express themselves right?When another place loses its wholesome, family-friendly nude spot, we naturists all lose, and we lose big time. It's a shame when a small percentage of visitors end up being walking pricks and uncontrolled clits, and those few do pull us all down with them with their lack of reasonable self control.
Going back to the original question, thoughts on seeing someone with a penis ring.
I dont care what you wear.
I do have opinions on it though.
In over twenty four years visiting nudist resorts ab beaches weve encountered all kinds of people from all walks of life with all kinds of interests. Weve met many swingers at nudist resorts but happily never encountered anything overtly sexual from their public behaviour.
Weve also seen couples with various piercings and genital decorations. If we see a woman with pierced nipples and clit ring with a man sporting a Prince Albert we automatically assume they are swingers. They may not always be, but personal experience tells us its almost always the case. Everyone else at the resort also thinks this. So if we see a guy with a cock ring, we might not think hes a swinger, (being solo and in his later years, usually) but we definitely think a sexual encounter is on his mind.
So when a bejewelled guy sits down next to us at the pool when there are dozens of other free loungers, I do question his motives. I wouldnt question the motives of a guy in a hat, or someone wearing sunglasses.
So dont start that bollocks and expect us to fall for it.
Answering the original question then, If I see a guy with a penis ring, I think he is wearing it because he want others to know, hes part of the looking for fun crowd even though its just making him look pathetic instead,
StevieLorna wrote:In over twenty four years visiting nudist resorts ab beaches weve encountered all kinds of people from all walks of life with all kinds of interests. Weve met many swingers at nudist resorts but happily never encountered anything overtly sexual from their public behaviour.Weve also seen couples with various piercings and genital decorations. If we see a woman with pierced nipples and clit ring with a man sporting a Prince Albert we automatically assume they are swingers.
I wonder if that's a cultural difference between Europe and the Americas. It's good to know how you'd be received at a different environment than you're used to. So people may need to keep that in mind when traveling.
Here in the western US, I haven't seen genital jewelry used as an indicator of promiscuity. (Or maybe I'm too obtuse to get the reference. I am in many ways more naive than most people are.)
Thanks for your observation.
One more thing: there's a great temptation in the public mind to conflate genital jewelry, or even simple nudity, with overt sexual activity. The latter is definitely out if we want to keep beaches nudist-friendly, as I'll explain below. But nudity is equated with pornography in our culture (if you doubt me, just put the word "nudist" or "nude" in your browser and see how far you have to scroll down before you find a genuine nudist web site.) That's the biggest obstacle we face.
I wonder what's being discussed at city councils in the areas where nude beaches are threatened. I don't know if they saying that "We've got to close down this beach because people are going beyond mere public displays of affection" or "We've got to close down this beach because people are wearing genital jewelry that we find out of line" or "We've got to close down this beach because people are walking around buck-naked."
Here in the US, the last statement is usually all that's necessary to put the kibosh on nudist activities on public land. If the people are naked, we have to stop it. It doesn't matter what they're doing, or what they're wearing in the way of jewelry. Nudity is immoral, and therefore must be made illegal.
But there's no question at all about public humping. It has no place in any public venue, whether naked or clothed. In California and other states, it easily falls under the category of "lewd and lascivious behavior" that's been the catch-all for any prosecution of public nudity. I don't see any problem with people being prosecuted for that. But I'm horrified that its presence on a public beach is used as a justification for banning all nudity.
The notion that Europe where everyday nudity is much more common place is different from the US in equating genital jewelry to promiscuity while us delighted people in the western US do seems so far fetched it strains credulity.
Could it simply be that genital jewelry like all other jewelry is meant to call attention to itself and signal something about the intention of the the wearer as another commenter suggested. Example wedding rings call attention to an individual hand and signal they are not available. Earrings call attention to the wearers face and can signal several things including a desire to be seen or in some cases sexual orientation.
All body decoration including jewelry serve a purpose and signal intention. To suggest that some how genital jewelry in this case cock rings are except from that just benign and so should be treated with benign neglect the so called live and let live approach is a paper tiger and ruse IMO opinion meant to deflect attention away from the factual impact that genital jewelry and other sexual devices (like butt plugs) worn a clothing optional beaches has on the experience of the vast majority of people who do not feel the need to accessorize it that fashion in said beaches. As well as the impact it has on the mainstream public perception which continues to result in the erosion of public clothing optional spaces.
IMO the desires of the many for nonsexual clothing optional spaces are being subjugation by the desires of the few under the guise of individual freedom, respect and tolerance.
Come on Woodsman, I honestly cant believe you are that naive.
I visit a family friendly resort where on our first trip there I figured I'd be the only guy with genital piercings...to my surprise that was not the case at all. I have seen dozens of men(probably 30-40), in the 2 years we have been going, with genital piercings ranging in age from 20s to 70s, including the owner of the resort. And not a single one has ever came across as cruising, looking to hookup, or swinging to my wife and I or any of our friends at the resort. Now are some of them swingers? probably so, I am sure some are single men who would enjoy sex as well. But a genital piercing does not equate to swinging, cruising, or looking to hookup. Making a blanket statement that all men with genital piercings are swingers and looking for sex is just as dumb as the blanket statement other people make when they say that all nudist are sexual deviants.
Well, maybe I am. Or maybe I just see people at face value, without a lot of pre-judgment. I dunno.
There it is, the Im not judgmental card.
Woodsman your statement is an oxymoron. By saying you have accepted people at face value is also a judgment on their character.
Whether or not wearing a cock ring make you sexually promiscuous or more likely, wishing to be sexually promiscuous its how others see you, and thats the problem.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!