Daisy Dukes suited Daisy Duke, a fit young lady with million dollar legs (not my opinion, its what was claimed they were insured for)They dont suit a septuagenarian male with a kink. Never will.so what Im saying is its not about fashion its about you and your disrespect for your family.
Back in the days when The Dukes of Hazzard were on tv, men in shorts almost as short as Daisy's were not uncommon.
Maybe because you can't wear boxers with very short shorts and that was the preferred underwear for older men and that time.
Hahahahahah.
The old, Im 75 years old and would love to wear Daisy Dukes, but for those damned pesky boxer shorts, excuse.
I love your deranged logic. But not your BS made up non facts,
Probably depends where one lives. In Australia Stubbies shorts used to be almost universal, but underwear would have commonly be some form of brief. I have no pictures of myself in them but this is quite typical.
When I mentioned something about Stubbies in the 1980s to my brother-in-law who lives in Australia. he said that the word more often referred to beer in small bottles than to shorts in Australia. Surprised me since Stubbies shorts were manufactured there.
I was more surprised by a language difference on our last visit to Australia.
We took our brother-in-law and his family to a fairly nice restaurant for dinner. There was a sign in the lobby that men in thongs were permitted in the bar area, but not the main dining room. Since thongs in the US usually refer to swimwear or underwear with little or no back, I was puzzled until our niece's husband said that it referred to the footwear usually called flip-flops in the US. Since he was wearing thongs (Australian definition) we had dinner at a table in the bar area.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!