Intactivism

This may be more for Americans than other nudists since totally unnecessary baby boy torture/mutilation is still at a 70% high among developed nations compared to Australia with a 30% cut rate. One of the first things naturist/nudist/exhibitionist men are scrutinized more for beyond our smile, hair loss, or gut size is whether we are cut or not. Obviously, to the educated, a lot of myths still abound and many Americans have been conditioned to think and feel that what is NATURAL and NORMAL is unsightly or unhealthy weather it is a nude body or an uncircumcised penis.

How many parents have harmed their baby boys this way?
How many refuse to.
How many men have anxiety over their cut or uncut manhood?
How many women feel the prepuce is more grotesque than the vulva covering the clitoris? (basically same function)
Any men in reCOVERy?

More info:
https://www.circumstitions.com/basics.html
https://www.restoringforeskin.org

This topic was edited
RE:Intactivism

I was circumsiced at birth in 1950 . It was the thing to do even though my dad was not. I don't remember ever seeing anyone who had not been cut while growing up and using open locker rooms at the pool, beach, and school gym. I certainly don't regret my situation and have never given it a thought. My son born in 1981 did not have the surgery, nor has my six year old grandson. My step grandsons have been cut because Daddy wanted them to look like him.

This post was edited