Cashback - the movie

I was walking through my local Asda and noticed a DVD for just 3. I picked it up and read the sleeve and because it had Emilia Fox in it and looked interesting I bought it - only 3 so it didn't matter if it was cr*p.
So the general story is about a guy who can freeze time, he is an artist and works in a supermarket so when he froze time he'd undress a custome and draw them, he'd dress them again and restart time. Sadly, Emilia Fox wasn't one of his nudes!! At one point in the film he remembers his childhood and the Swedish student who lived with him and wore very little, the film showed her walking up the stairs with the rear view between her legs being rather explicit but not sexual.
The question I had after watching it and the very few shots of anything more than breasts was 'why the hell was this an 18' OK a flash of labia may have been too much for the censor but we can see people being hacked to death or blown to pieces and it might get a 15 certificate. It wasn't sexual nudity and seeing labia is equal to seeing a penis so no big deal. Just another example of the overly cautious censor when it comes to nudity compared to blood and gore - the world is mad!!

This topic was edited
RE: Cashback - the movie

What are "18" and "15" ? I presume they are part of a rating system that says what age is appropriate for a movie, along the lines of the P, PG, PG-13, R & NC-17 in the US.

This post was edited
RE: Cashback - the movie

the simpsons movie was going to get a higher rating then it did just because there a very brief shot of a naked bart's animated penis. if you didn't know to look for it you'd probably miss it. if a big stink was made over cartoon nudity it's no wonder they get censor crazy over a real naked person.

This post was edited