But does this mean that everyone who volunteers they are swingers, are they soliciting?
That would require telepathy to know. However, given the humber of times that this subject has arisen, and the number of groups on that subject that have been deleted, one would assume that the person would be at least vaguely aware that the site admin has declared it to be an inappropriate topic. That would lead one to wonder what motivated the person to broach the subject.If so, then each such profile could be flagged and should be deleted. Since there are many such profiles, it suggests that this admission is permissable.
First, with well over 80,000 profiles and dozens more appearing each day, the admins would be hard pressed to keep up with the incoming, let alone to scan every profile on the site. IAC, there appears to be no evidence that the mere mention in a profile is taboo.Yes, I understand this point. Though in truth, tire of it.
So, how to treat the person who enters the chat and says, Any swingers care to chat?
The question would be, "Chat about what?"
I don't think this is a necessary question to be asking. TN has said elsewhere that what goes on in private chats between consenting members is their affair so long as they do not broach the subject with someone not consenting. I will see if I can find this, but assume at this point that it is true.
Perhaps you might want to consider the word in context rather than playing the pedant. Never argue with the WordMaster.
Hhahahhhahaa, uh huh I believe the context was, having more than one intimate relationship....having more than one sex relationship...yep..works pretty well, don't ya think? Damn, your just too much fun to argue with lol Sorry.
Ok so lets all notify TT1 that it needs to be stated in the rule - no swinging members allowed that will put an end to this discussion. Swinging is all about a sexually driven lifestyle and as there are swingers that are nudist most nudist are not swingers. If your a nudist and a swinger then just state your here to befriend fellow nudist and keep your sexual preferances private and join those sites that allow and adhere to that lifestyle. Lets get off the gay discussion though as that will cause more harm than good.
I"ll give you the benefit of the doubt that your hearts in the right place, but surely you can see the problem with banning members based on sexual preferences?
As long as people adhere to the rules, they should be allowed here.
I think a lot of people are missing what I am getting at. This thread was started because of another thread where someone got really upset with a person in the chat, discussing Swinging with another swinger, apparently. This led me to question whether or not we had the right to challenge swingers. Cleary, we have seen from NudeInMa, that we do. That is the first point.
.
The second question that I have, even if someone is discussing swinging, but it is not sexually explicit, should that be permissable? It would be nice to get a consensus on this, but I don't see the liklihood of that happening.
.
Ultimately though, I hope we can deal with this issue in a civil manor. If the person becomes difficult, then flag and leave it to administration. Thanks for your participation.
I think a lot of people are missing what I am getting at. This thread was started because of another thread where someone got really upset with a person in the chat, discussing Swinging with another swinger, apparently. This led me to question whether or not we had the right to challenge swingers. Cleary, we have seen from NudeInMa, that we do. That is the first point. . The second question that I have, even if someone is discussing swinging, but it is not sexually explicit, should that be permissable? It would be nice to get a consensus on this, but I don't see the liklihood of that happening. . Ultimately though, I hope we can deal with this issue in a civil manor. If the person becomes difficult, then flag and leave it to administration. Thanks for your participation.
seriously, this is not the place for swingers, this is the place for honest hardworking people that don't wear clothes to come together. Don't fuck it up with stupid "weenie waggers"
I believe the context was, having more than one intimate relationship....having more than one sex relationship...yep..works pretty well, don't ya think?
Intimacy does not imply random fornication. BTW, is your intimacy with your SO strictly sexual?
Hehehehe...uh, yeah, a meaning of intimate means precisely that, fornication. And BTW, what eles are you suggesting I use that blow up doll for? Taking it out for dinner? Sipping wine by candlight, dancing to frnak sinatra...okay okay, sometimes we dance.
I believe the context was, having more than one intimate relationship....having more than one sex relationship...yep..works pretty well, don't ya think?
Intimacy does not imply random fornication. BTW, is your intimacy with your SO strictly sexual?
Hehehehe...uh, yeah, a meaning of intimate means precisely that, fornication. And BTW, what eles are you suggesting I use that blow up doll for? Taking it out for dinner? Sipping wine by candlight, dancing to frank sinatra...okay okay, sometimes we dance.
Never argue with the WordMaster - I did not Shakespeare had a profile here. What name is he using?
My humility disallows my revealing the identity of the WordMaster. Indeed, of my many transcendentally wonderful traits, my humiity is the most awesome, doubly so because of the utter lack of need for it.
Thanks for not picking on my sentence that was missing a word Mr Hathaway. I have since edited it. You truly are awesome
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!