I like seeing aroused senior men
I ve always enjoyed the human form whether practical erotic or sexual. So struggle to make sense of people who belong to nudist clubs taking offense to erections or any form of encounters between men and women or men and men. It's happening in plain sight couples kissing and having sexual encounters and they are the dressed ones
Suddenly we take our clothes off and we become asexual. Can't imagine how so many people had children and were having sex within earshot of their other children
Get over it people sex is natural and shame is not for the 21st century.
Discretion is always applicable and having unwanted attention drawn to a silly few shouldn't ruin everyone else's life style
Just my opinion
I agree with you completely.
Clearly, nudity is not about sex, but nude people do have sex. In the same manner, showers are not about sex, but people have sex in the shower.
Sex is a normal, natural, and healthful. There's no more reason to hide it than there is to hide eating. We are, after all, not the Bakairi tribe in Brazil.
Boners are a normal, natural, and healthful part of male anatomy and physiology. There is nothing to hide and no reason for doing so.
And the title of the thread. I especially enjoy seeing an aroused senior man because as we age, boners become more and more difficult to obtain. So, it's very heartening to see an older man proudly sporting a fine boner.
I agree, the naked male body is beautiful and shouldn't be hidden, which is why I have no bedroom or bathroom doors in my home. Erections, masturbating and sex are NORMAL and welcome in my home. I have no problem being watched while my partner and I are making passionate love and showing our affection for each other.
I agree, the naked male body is beautiful and shouldn't be hidden, which is why I have no bedroom or bathroom doors in my home. Erections, masturbating and sex are NORMAL and welcome in my home. I have no problem being watched while my partner and I are making passionate love and showing our affection for each other.
That's as it should be.
The issue of misandry has been dividing and killing nudism in the Midwestern part of the US. This thread raises a valid point: what is appropriate public behavior for individuals and couples, clothed or unclothed? Banning or discriminating against a population doesn't clarify that, guidelines do.
I believe that senior men can become aroused and still act appropriately in a resort that includes young children. I don't believe resorts can survive if they ban young children with a single dad who's not welcome without a female escort.
Nudism started as a modern movement in Germany about 150 years ago as part of "Lebensreform" or life reform to reclaim health, wellness and vitality in the industrial age. This has faded in US nudism/naturism to be largely replaced by a sedentary puritanism. I believe my sons, now in college, will seek to reclaim wellness and vitality in this digital age on their terms. This may include healthy nudity but not nudism, a movement which excluded them as children.
Agree with VoodooMagick 100%.
I noticed most of those who enjoy seeing other men's erect penises list themselves as 'Gay' or 'Bi' in their profile. I am sure that at a gay nude resort, walking around with a 'stiffy' is quite acceptable. Maybe those who like seeing other men's erect members should check out such clubs?
Probably the best post I've seen on this site yet. Again and again we see it in nudist literature; the oft repeated 'non-sexual nudism' repeated in every second sentence. As if just to remind us should we forget, better repeat it again in the next sentence. There's an odd hypocrisy in that in a nudist environment one is not considered nude unless the genitals are exposed. You can expose everything else, but until the genitals - not any other part - are exposed, you aren't considered "nude". But! Take any interest in those genitals, talk about them, be seen looking at them - well you're no longer a "nudist"!
This anti sex mantra is precisely what kept me from the mainstream nude beaches for so long, because I believed it.
To me, an erection is as natural as being naked. People are sexual beings. Yet, there was this conflict where I felt I couldn't go to a mainstream nude beach because I would have to hide and deny what was just as natural as being nude.
However, as I did eventually discover, it all turned out to be BS. There is a small group of anti sex nudists, which seem to be predominantly females, but most nudists don't have a problem with it, provided discretion is used. In this part of the world, most beaches have an out of the way area for this purpose, and it works very well. And on every Australian nude beach I've been to, I've never seen a problem with anyone having an erection.
The concept of a beach full of hot guys (or whatever your preference) not being arousing is laughable. Again, you'd have to be in some kind of denial/internal guilt, or just be asexual not to see it. On the contrary to what the prudes bleat on about, nudism is not exclusive to sex. That is not to say sex has to be part of a day at the beach, but it can be.
Fact is in my wide circle of nudist friends, we all indulge in something at one time or another. Not all the time, and not every time, but the freedom is there if one wants to. All the male only nudist organisations I know of accept it.
An amusing story to finish up with was at a nudist resort, where the owners kept on pushing the no-sex mantra. Much amusement ensued when one of their guests caught them having sex in the open in their own resort.
Hope never have a day where as a aging senior I cannot get it up - agree its part of life and makes it worth living. And probably a boner a day helps keep us out of declining health. AustinJohn PS sorry cannot share on here since against the rules but always willing to share off here.