As once again much of your post is utter bollocks Ill ignore
I will address this though.The fact that your on a nudist forum and against it unless on your own terms is really something else!!
They arent my terms David, they are the terms every real world nudist weve ever met in resorts all over Europe share. Something it seems youve yet to experience.
I know about three months have gone by, and it was said on this thread that I was behaving like a 4 year old when I rightly advised in the early years of living, that people actually did live naked. There were various reasons for this and one such reason was the lack of materials to make cloths. Anyway moving on, here is some information from other nudists research that I came across where they understand more about the message I was trying to get across on this forum...
The question that sparked this exploration into naturism and primitively reveals a common misconception about both concepts, highlighting a lack of understanding of their true nature and implications. Primitively, often associated with pre-civilization or early human societies, does not inherently involve a conscious choice to be naked. For primitive people, nudity was a natural state, devoid of the cultural or social meanings it carries today. They were naked for practical reasons related to their environment and lifestyle needs, not out of philosophical or lifestyle choices. Their lack of clothing was not a statement or an ideology but a simple fact of their existence, often dictated by the climate, activities, or absence of available materials for clothing.



