RE:Separating social nudity from sexual nudity

Andy, I grew up Catholic, take a ticket and get in line.

This post was edited
RE:Separating social nudity from sexual nudity

I always have to chuckle when the one trick pony " victimized" males on this site accuse others of having one track minds.

This post was edited
RE:Separating social nudity from sexual nudity

You dont judge people unless they disagree with you.And the, its my boner and Ill show it off if I want to is exactly the attitude that is destroying it for the guys who just want to enjoy nudism.I know youll never admit to being in the wrong on this. Its just your nature.

This kind of judging is unfortunate. What would any young prospective naturist think reading negativity?

As a dad of two sons whove grown up naturist and are now young adults I have a perspective on the attitudes of the younger generation from constant interaction. The views that Stoneandy has presented are in keeping with the upcoming generation. Hes right. And the reality is that the judging and puritanically inspired castigation to which he personally, as well as his opinions, are being subjected belong to the very thinking thats actually killing old school naturism in places where its tolerated. And the killing off of that old-school naturism is a positive development. It had its time when attitudes were very different - in a time when many things which the younger generation of today rightly find offensive dominated.

Shock horror reactions to an erection belong in Puritanism, not naturism. Anti-male bigotry is sexist and has no place anywhere civilised. The history of Puritanism is not an illustrious one - its one of hypocrisy, bigotry and harm. Sex and sexuality are no longer hidden the way they once were. Society has moved on and so has the upcoming generation of naturists. Now I expect to join Stoneandy in being castigated and I dont care because the only opinions that matter are those of the younger generations and theyre laughing at old school naturism. Those of us who have ongoing contact with them get the joke!

This post was edited
RE:Separating social nudity from sexual nudity

A puritanical nudist is an oxymoron.

This post was edited
RE:Separating social nudity from sexual nudity

A puritanical nudist is an oxymoron.
Exactly! It makes no sense does it!! lol

So now that were in agreement, heres to open minds as well as bare bodies!

This post was edited
RE:Separating social nudity from sexual nudity

And coming from a two month old account barely filled out no profile photo but credibility should be assumed.

A puritanical nudist is an oxymoron.

This post was edited
RE:Separating social nudity from sexual nudity

And coming from a two month old account barely filled out no profile photo but credibility should be assumed.A puritanical nudist is an oxymoron.

I wouldnt know, Im blocked.

This post was edited
RE:Separating social nudity from sexual nudity

The majority of textiles are under the impression, that because naturist/nudist men do not immediatly get arroused and have a ragung erection at the sight of a nude female, we are sexless drones!! This couldn't be further from the truth, it is completely false!! We are just as sexual as the rest of society, perhaps even more so because we see immediatly what we like, what turns us on and gets us excited but unlike textiles, instead of being disappointed in our partner's appearance when we see them undressed the first time, we know when it is appropriate to have sex, at the right time, in the right place, in the right environment, in the right circumstances, with the right partner or partners, etc.!!!

This post was edited
RE:Separating social nudity from sexual nudity

The majority of textiles are under the impression, that because naturist/nudist men do not immediatly get arroused and have a raging erection at the sight of a nude female, we are sexless drones!! This couldn't be further from the truth, it is completely false!! We are just as sexual as the rest of society, perhaps even more so because we see immediatly what we like, what turns us on and gets us excited but unlike textiles, instead of being disappointed in our partner's appearance when we see them undressed the first time, we know when it is appropriate to have sex, at the right time, in the right place, in the right environment, in the right circumstances, with the right partner or partners, etc.!!!

This post was edited
RE:Separating social nudity from sexual nudity

The majority of textiles are under the impression, that because naturist/nudist men do not immediatly get arroused and have a raging erection at the sight of a nude female, we are sexless drones!! This couldn't be further from the truth, it is wrong and completely false!! We are just as sexual as the rest of society, perhaps even more so because we immediatly see what we like, what turns us on and gets us excited but unlike textiles, instead of being disappointed in our partner's appearance when we see them undressed for the first time, we know when it is appropriate to have sex (either outercourse or entercourse), at the right time, in the right place, in the right environment, in the right circumstances, with the right partner or partners, etc.!!!

This post was edited