A positive way of playing nice in the sandbox of True Nudists might include the acceptance that this is a form of entertainment first, a way to bear witness to other people's views (and presumably bodies), to maybe learn something about sharing nudism in a more public way, and to show off oneself as second, third and fourth. No one is being forced to interact, though that may be assumed to be the main point of being here.We all could stay home bare in the comfort of our private spaces, but we choose instead to seek out nude life forms and nude civilizations, to boldly go nude where no one has gone nude before! Staying in the twenty-third century for another moment - oh what a joy it would have been for Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise to happen upon a planet where all its inhabitants evolved without any want for clothes, and the wearing of any covering was considered a capital offense!
There was (is?) a French TV show called nu that is set in a future world where most clothing is banned for safety and security reasons.
A positive way of playing nice in the sandbox of True Nudists might include the acceptance that this is a form of entertainment first, a way to bear witness to other people's views (and presumably bodies), to maybe learn something about sharing nudism in a more public way, and to show off oneself as second, third and fourth. No one is being forced to interact, though that may be assumed to be the main point of being here.We all could stay home bare in the comfort of our private spaces, but we choose instead to seek out nude life forms and nude civilizations, to boldly go nude where no one has gone nude before! Staying in the twenty-third century for another moment - oh what a joy it would have been for Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise to happen upon a planet where all its inhabitants evolved without any want for clothes, and the wearing of any covering was considered a capital offense!
Some anthropologists believe that humans started wearing clothing because of global cooling and people expanding into cooler regions.
Maybe the combination of global warming and more people moving to warmer areas (at least in the US) will encourage future generations to abandon clothes!
You should point out which stories you believe to be Walter Mitty-esque! No use hiding behind broad statements I say!I did say that they were so blindingly obvious its so easy spot one.If you cant spot a fabrication then thats your problem not mine.
But that's the problem - apathy or ambivalence, with folks unwilling to call out the BS and 'leaving it to someone else'.
If you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem
This won't happen until you have a site limited to respectful nudists and naturists. Very few real nudist women have thick enough skin to stick around for more than a couple of weeks. If all the woman who joined but were run off were still here, it would be a very different site..
Yep as someone who was here at the very start when there were only 25 then left and came back I can say very few if any of the genuine nudist/naturist women who were hear then remain.
But that's the problem - apathy or ambivalence, with folks unwilling to call out the BS and 'leaving it to someone else'.If you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem
Thats the thing with BS, even if you are too blind to see it, it also gives off a nauseous smell. So still easy to identify.
Sadly, you can get called a troll for calling it out, by some here who believe a lot of the BS.
For instance, there is a very, very old joke, so old I first heard it in black and white. Its about answering the door naked to religious types to frighten them off. Id never try to pass that off as my story. That would stink of BS.
* except * for the persistent unwelcome overtures to the real women and the tensions in chat over moderation, the rest of this negative stuff - fakes, fantasies, endless piercing / shaving discussions, etc etc, would be easy enough to ignore if there were more going on in terms of discussions, group activity, and connection to actual, real-world groups, places, and people.
* except * for the persistent unwelcome overtures to the real women and the tensions in chat over moderation, the rest of this negative stuff - fakes, fantasies, endless piercing / shaving discussions, etc etc, would be easy enough to ignore if there were more going on in terms of discussions, group activity, and connection to actual, real-world groups, places, and people.
Thats very true.
There are many more people doing it and living it than just talking and dreaming about it .
Ive been looking for the thread .Is This The Answer.
In it, member Nude4070 claimed a naturist resort in eastern Queensland was hosting large numbers of homeless women. I challenged this and asked for the name of the place. It was never posted and now the entire thread has been deleted.
Was it all just made up BS. Was it easy to spot?
Would you prefer less activity, or more made up BS?
Unfortunately, the answer is painfully obvious. More junk postings are preferable to less substantive postings. The great *click bait* game is alive and well. Hearst & Murdoch are quite obviously smirking about all this. Its really pitiful.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!