Michelangelo with Peerless Unimpeachable Church Endorsement Could Not Have Gotten in Wrong

Nude Resurrected Christ was at least at iconic & Heroic as David, but censors have been hard at work denying Reality intoxicating the myopic & dimwitted with virtual ( FAKE ) reality concoctions.

Michelangelo with Peerless Unimpeachable Church Endorsement Could Not Have Gotten in Wrong because even MB surely had plenty of critics harping on His artistic license which was likely based on popular common notions & widespread oral tradition.

These figures were proudly reverently displayed in holy sacred churches without any nannie effective nannie detractors.

This topic was edited

Post #2 stoneandySuper Nudist

RE:Michelangelo with Peerless Unimpeachable Church Endorsement Could Not Have Gotten in Wrong

by stoneandyTextile

The church has offered plenty of nanny detractors over the centuries. I wouldn't be surprised if textile "improvements" were added and removed, just like on paintings. At the end of the day, it's still art and a resurrection figure loses its message in diapers.

This post was edited

Post #3 shorehamgentSuper Nudist

RE:Michelangelo with Peerless Unimpeachable Church Endorsement Could Not Have Gotten in Wrong

by shorehamgentTextile

The last two popes have reiterated that the human body is Gods creation and should not be shamed.

This post was edited

Show 1-2 of 2

Michelangelo with Peerless Unimpeachable Church Endorsement Could Not Have Gotten in Wrong

Actions

Share this topic