Pics lie. Profile pics of ladies with perky butts will hint to a lower W/H ratio and so do pics taken from a low point of view. Even pics from front or back can be a cheat. I have good hip mobility, I can make my butt look bigger compared to the waist by tipping my hips backwards (that's for pics from the back) or the other way round (you saw me in a couple pics like that). The most honest pics are from square front, camera at waist level.
I measured five of my friends and I can more or less estimate the others. What I can say is that a 0.9 ratio corresponds to a lady whose hips are exactly the same width as the waist from a frontal view (the difference of 10% will be seen in the profile view). This is the highest ratio among my friends and it belongs to Claire, who is a very sexy woman. She is slim and fit, has quite big breasts (C minus) and despite lacking an hourglass shape guys very much admire her small but perky butt, either dressed (always in something very tight) or naked.
So yes, I could add such pics and have a guessing contest but mods will not allow it...
But fine. For the very quick, I uploaded two pics, one with a 0.7 (well, precisely 0.69 on a big frame and with a cheating angle, taken from thigh level) and one with a 0.9 (well in fact 0.89, measured, on a relatively small frame) ratio. And last one which seems to stick, the blond girl in a field in the evening light is 0,78 on a very slim frame.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!