Just to make it to page 2 of this topic: now clear if you look at me. But how long and what body parts would you like me to look at more when you are nude in front of me?
Hmmm, maybe this question has "legs" and I should make a separate topic about it?
Just to make it to page 2 of this topic: now clear if you look at me. But how long and what body parts would you like me to look at more when you are nude in front of me?Hmmm, maybe this question has "legs" and I should make a separate topic about it?
Definitely worthy of a separate topic Jeanne... i think a faie exchange would be required, what would you want to look at longer and what would the man rather you focused your attention on!
The answer to both posed questions would be the same as Flora & Jeanne are two intelligent, very attractive women worthy of many, many 'look-overs'. My own perusing criteria usually consists of a general view of the overall package, does the package measure up as an attractive lady? Is the whole nicely composed with each part not overpowering the other but complementing it? Next, I'll do a quick summary of her face for a 'genuine' (very subjective) look. Then move down for proportionality as I observe her breasts for again appropriate size and how they are a part of the look. Here, that means not the full measure of a woman's beauty but how it supports the entire look. Moving further down, a reasonably sized midriff that connects to a nice set of hips and bottom. Do note that proportionate looks are paramount. Finally, the legs must fit the rest of the package. All the above takes place in 'the eye of the beholder' so it will not be the same for everyone. I am very partial to a 'clean, intelligent, girl-next-door' look.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!