So now we know where to come when we need poor quality "Morality Police" Just a quick look at 'Your' Friends list and we assume that you are able to distinguish between one 'particular' 'spread eagle picture' which is OK - yet you are alarmed by another. I think it now complels you, absolutely, to explain with Clarity, why the Spread Eagle fotos you have added on Your profile as your friends are acceptable ~ yet you need to "out" another. Don't they pass your perceptions of age , attractiveness, ?? your ideas of intent. An apology is well called for lest you be called 'out' for sheer and utter hypocrisy. Furthermore, perhaps you should sanction a re-structure of all male genitalia; which appears to be , in every instance, even more apparent. Better I think just to bypass the Pics that YOU do not aprove of - and leave the rest of us to make our own decisions. There's been a few changes in the last several decades, since the FKK movements and their quasi liberalism died from a lack of . interest. We don't also agree with everything we see. But we'll wait for you to catch up.
If we want to be respected and taken seriously by mainstream society, then we've got to adopt their morality - just with no clothes on. If we go saying "nudism is not about sex or sexual exhibitionism" and tolerate spread-eagled shots, then we've no one to blame but ourselves when the rest of society laughs at us.
If we want to be respected and taken seriously by mainstream society,
then we've got to adopt their morality - just with no clothes on. If we
go saying "nudism is not about sex or sexual exhibitionism" and
tolerate spread-eagled shots, then we've no one to blame but ourselves
when the rest of society laughs at us.
If we try top pretend that we don't have the same span of people as society.
If we try and pretend we have no interest in sex or sexuality.
If we try to suggest that we also don't have the same Good , Bad, and the Ugly.
If we try and pretend that the average age of nudists is now terribly non-representative of any other society.
If we refuse to accept that there is now a whole new demographic with the young nudists.
Worse still if we disenchant another generation of young potential Nudists.
Worst of all if we try and refuse individual rights and freedoms, even for women.
Or try and tell individuals what they have a right to see or ignore.
Then we are no better , or worse, than much of mainstream society.
Actually if guys are allowed to have spread eagle pics than the women should be allowed also. Just like in real society if men are allowed to go bare chested women should be allowed to go bare chested. If all the spread eagle pics of women are to be removed than all the spread eagle pics of men should be removed period.
As I said before.... Tolerance, people! "Judge not, lest ye be judged". Most people don't like to be judged, and if they are... They sometimes come back to bite you in the @ss.
I agree! Some tolerance please. I am a naturist, not a nudist butnudists areok with me. I read postings from some "supernudists" which really offend me. They are more prude than many textile people :-( I am a nudist for 35 years and I respect everyone. As long as there are no porn pictures, it is ok for me. If you are nude, some poses are possible without offending anyone.
Actually if guys are allowed to have spread eagle pics than the women should be allowed also. Just like in real society if men are allowed to go bare chested women should be allowed to go bare chested. If all the spread eagle pics of women are to be removed than all the spread eagle pics of men should be removed period.
Well I really find it very funny now . Whenever a female's photos are in question , we are accused of being biased towards men and when a male member's photos are in question , they accuse us of being homophobic and biased towards women . Before shooting off such irresponsible statements , please take the pains to go through the flagging2 thread .
Shooting off irresponsible statements? What are you talking about? If women can not have spread eagle pics on this site then men should not be able to have spread eagle pics on this site. What exactly is irresponsible with that statement? What part exactly is confusing you. Whats good for the goose is also good for the gander as it were.
It amazes me how all the "Tolerant" people jump in with a defence, without even seeing the pic in question. It is nothing short of gross, and would probably not even get on a sex site. Go take a look, you'll find the url to it here on comment #2716, and then come back and tell me that you think it's an appropriate representation of the nudist lifestyle.
EDIT:
Point made, link removed.
Phil,
I understand your perspective, and agree with it, to a point.
The profile in question has seen fit to remove such photo.
At this point, perhaps the link is best left to private communications ?
Perhaps they have learned ?
From other content on the site, and the picture comments here and there, it is quite possible
that they took their queue from some existing "site content," however since they *have*
responded by removing such, I'm inclined to give 'em a pass, pending future behaviour.
As has been said for some time, the failure of administration to police photographs is not
blameless in the additional photos, and their content.
Sure, eventually he gets a round tuit, but by then they've been seen, and queued others
into what is *apparently* acceptable, sometimes even encouraged.
There is a snowball affect.
Phil, I understand your perspective, and agree with it, to a point. The profile in question has seen fit to remove such photo. At this point, perhaps the link is best left to private communications ? Perhaps they have learned ? From other content on the site, and the picture comments here and there, it is quite possible that they took their queue from some existing "site content," however since they *have* responded by removing such, I'm inclined to give 'em a pass, pending future behaviour. As has been said for some time, the failure of administration to police photographs is not blameless in the additional photos, and their content. Sure, eventually he gets a round tuit, but by then they've been seen, and queued others into what is *apparently* acceptable, sometimes even encouraged. There is a snowball affect.
Totally agree Curt, I'll remove this link later.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!