Vote for the new moderators
I DISAGREE WITH YOU THERE, MODERATORS ARE NEEDED ON THIS SITE, THERE ARE TO MANY PERVERTS USING THE ROOM TO GET ON CAM AND MASTURBATE YET THERE IS A SISTER SITE WHERE THEY CAN DO THAT. NUDISM HAS A BAD ENOUGH NAME WITH OUT PEOPLE LIKE THAT JOINING OUR SITE. MODERATORS ARE DEFFO NEEDED.
Ditto.
Moderators are not needed in the chat room or in the site in general ; there is enough cops here who are more moderators than the moderators themselves.It should be nice to moderate some of them.But who can do that ?
Really??? so who is going to get rid of those that decide to sit in chat with hands on their penis having a jolly good tug and then cumming on cam???? And who is going to get rid of the couple that decide it is A OK to have sex on cam????? Who is going to get rid of those males that decide that it is appropriate to send females private messages asking them to spread their legs etc etc.......
No we don't need moderators at all....just more pervs to ensure that women in general do not use the chat room, do not use their cams, and just basically sit back and be treated like a piece of meat for the taking!!!!!!!
Hear! Hear! Jackie, I completely agree. There are *PLENTY* of adult sites, where such behaviour is perfectly acceptable, but they want to come here and do it.
I don't cam, because I don't want to see it. If I did want to see, there are other sites...
I rarely go into, or stay in, the chat room, because of the boors. One night I was in the chat room and kept getting PMs asking if I want to watch them have a wank, and had a few just send the cam request. They got denied, blocked, and ignored. I soon left chat because I didn't feel like dealing with the jerks.
I have noticed that most of the cretins are uncertified with private profiles, or are friends only with blank profiles.
I block private profiles. If you're on a social site, trying to meet people (whether for X-rated, or non X-rated activities), what's the point of having a private profile?
The only reason I use the chat room is because I do have a couple of people on my friends list that I chat with.
Moderators are not needed in the chat room or in the site in general ; there is enough cops here who are more moderators than the moderators themselves.It should be nice to moderate some of them.But who can do that ?
Really??? so who is going to get rid of those that decide to sit in chat with hands on their penis having a jolly good tug and then cumming on cam???? And who is going to get rid of the couple that decide it is A OK to have sex on cam????? Who is going to get rid of those males that decide that it is appropriate to send females private messages asking them to spread their legs etc etc.......
No we don't need moderators at all....just more pervs to ensure that women in general do not use the chat room, do not use their cams, and just basically sit back and be treated like a piece of meat for the taking!!!!!!!
Respect was lost a long time ago when $$$$ started rolling in. It is a shame for true nakies to find a chat or possibly a meet.When whankers got plenty place to go. So many have left this site for simple respect is lost. If folks acted as if in person and not so far away may be different. just my 2 cents.
I don't think in the years of belonging to this site, and being a paid member that I have ever dis-agreed with Jackie. Far less ever had crossed words with the Lady.& in this respect I too support her. Not all men are the same, some of us are decent, friendly and respectful, not just to women, but those with disabilities, health issues or what-ever is going on in their lives. But keep it decent, keep it respectful; that is why there is the private chat function.I know being a single, nudist male of certain years puts me at a dis-advantage, but I neither like going to naturist beaches where "meer-kats" hide in the bushes, or the same online.Let the flaming back at me begin. PMSL.Andrew.
Moderators are not needed in the chat room or in the site in general
That depends on the intents of the owner and the members.
If the intent is just another orgy/porn/anything-goes site with primarily naked people of any age, sex ( all 3 ) or orientation, then we can agree.
If the intent is in any way intended to be civil, then the site went far too long without moderation, forcing it as a now necessary evil.; there is enough cops here who are more moderators than the moderators themselves.
Predictable fall out of the above.It should be nice to moderate some of them.But who can do that ?
On THAT point, we are in full agreement.
The only one I know of, is TT1, possibly TT2.
This thread was not meant to be about Jackie. It's about people who want to be "elected".
We agree the thread was not meant to be about Jackie. ( it's nearly impossible to oppose Jackie's view, if one has been here more than a few days )
We disagree it's about people who want to be elected !
The way I read it, it's about the need for moderation at all, an issue resolved, is it two years ago now ?
( though I would question the motivations of anyone *wanting* to be elected to such a thankless position )
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!