If you are still curious about penises and foreskins, I suggest you take a look at ErectionPhotos.com. It is a very NON-sexual look at men's penises showing the wide range of sizes that are normal, differences in how much they grow when erect, foreskin coverage, etc. It's an interesting survey, especially when we can be bombarded with images of porn stars with much larger than average penises.
(no, I have no connection to the site...)
I was circumcised at an early age and I believe that it was a well done procedure. However throughout the years, with all the expansion and contraction my skin lost its elasticity. Today, in its flaccid state, I look like I have had only a part of my foreskin removed.
I have a friend that moved here from Romania after the fall of communism. He calls circumcision "Jewish camouflage". He says that during the holocaust the Jewish men were easily identified by their circumcision. He maintains that after the war the medical community, influenced by the Jewish doctors, decided to push for circumcision for all baby boys so it couldn't be used to identify Jews ever again. I have never quite made up my mind on whether or not I believe this.
I was circumcised in 1927 many years before the holocaust. I'm Irish-American.
Circumcision was popularized in the English-speaking world in the late 19th century as a way to discourage - how to put this so it does not become click bait... handling oneself? One of the greatest advocates was John Harvey Kellogg, who asserted that corn flakes had the same effect. Kellogg was a Seventh-Day Adventist, and certainly not a Jew. The medical profession in the US got fully on board, and remained so, solidly, into the 1950's. So any doctors your Romanian friend found pushing the practice were probably American, maybe British.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!