how erect is an erection pic ??????
Hi all;
just a quick note; as in all nudist/naturist sites, we have the discussion of erections in pics. I have noticed from a few pics on here, blokes with a good semi and/or a lazy lob to coin venacular. I am not a lover of offending anyone so i tend not to put a pic of me up with a semi erection. As I'm sure with all males, I get an erection when my wife takes a pic f me on the beach or in the back garden, because it does push the button. However, who is the moral benchmark to say that is an erection.... rather than a semi.
It's not like someone has been caught in a video and there were no other options. With digital cameras and plenty of options to delete and retake, or take a hundred pics, why must that one questionable picture that is'CHOSEN" to be posted, posted? That all comes down to the member's decision to display.
Yes, there are varying degrees of sizes and such depending on weather, attitude, and thoughts. Flacid should be acceptable without a question, whether an inch, four inches, or such, but a fully erect penis, or a penis partially erect in a provacative pose, IE camera shot from the knees or with the legs spread as a display stand are all within the control and selection of the image by the member to post.
Steve
P.S. How does one define Gray? But common sense and being safe and cautious about what you post shows a lot about you, so women don't cup your breasts and squeeze them together, and guys, standing sideways and thrusting your hips forward pronouncing that you have pieces parts, comes awfully close to giving the 'wrong' impression.
Hi all , again, yes I totally get and agree with all sentiments; yet, there are still some pics with semi or erections. Its just the ambiguity I have an issue with.... if the TOS state no erection pics either full or partial body shot ...then no erections it is. It is not the case of what is good for the goose, I am not trying to get a pi cof me with an erection on here to test the moderators.... but someconsistencyfrom them wold be appreciated, I 'm sure for a lot of folk.
If were gona have rules for the good of all, then use them.
I have a serious question about this...I PM'd a member a while back about some pictures that appeared to be erections suggesting that he might want to remove them. He is pretty old, and it occurred to me later that it might be a penile implant. Would that cause a man to appear to be erect all the time?
Gator1
An erection is not always sexual. I am sure that many know what I mean. Sometimes it can happen at the most awkward of times as we all know. That is why I find this and many other nudist organisations are very closed minded and just as restricted as those organisations who are opposed to any sort of nudity at all. Who really calls the shots? And what is really acceptable? I think that this is a bunch of bullshit myself. If you can not deal with an erection than maybe it is time to reflect, and ask oneself where does one judge or limit what is acceptable when it comes to ones own body.
This thread is NOT about erections!
It is about posting pictures of erections.
please go and find the appropriate threads,
of which there are many, and you will see that
the subject has already been discussed in great detail.
An erection is not always sexual. ... blahblahblah ... Think quite clearly before responding.
Having quite clearly thought about your two posts, my well-considered response is as follows:
You CAN'T fool ME NudeIN!
That guy is wayyyyyy tooooooo handsome,
To be YOU!!!
An erection is not always sexual and is a very natural thing. Though, generally speaking they are associated with levels of arousal, it is common as any man will tell you to get an erection "out of the blue".
With that being said, this website is different than an actual nudist environment such as a beach or club. At a beach of club, erections are inevitable and the occasional erection shouldn't be an issue as long as it is handled appropriately. However, a site such as this where you deliberately choose the pictures which you include, an erection picture is not suitable, whether or not the picture was taken at a time of sexual arousal or a random andunwarranted erection.
If your parents or children were nudists, would you take a picture of yourself with an erection and send it to them in email or otherwise? I should hope not. The same attitude should be applied here.
While ultimately it can be argued that an erection can be innocent, choosing to include it takes away that level of innocents in my opinion.
I myself am a grower, not a shower. It used to bother me when I was younger and I was very self conscious about it. However, I became a man and put away childish things. Obviously during certain activities (walking/running, volleyball, etc.) an increased systemic blood flow will also increase blood flow to the penis, thus changing the size especially for a grower. This should be suitable even for pictures on here depicting those activities but there is a vast difference between that type of "growth" and a semi or full erection.
Actions
Back to TopicsReply to TopicShare this topic
Get paid just by sending us users/traffic.
Signup takes seconds, start now!
Signup as an affiliate!