One chat room is enough. For those who are not happy with the existing circumstances there are two options. One is to tolerate those who you consider below you in morals and ethics or two; leave the site. Personally, I'm not elated by some of the actions of others, however; I'm not in a position to cast the first stoneand will therefore accept the site as it currently exists.
Tolerate or leave ....Third option, campaign for change.I think that's how change works.
Tolerate, huh! Now there's a good word. It's toleration by naive misguided fools that is mainly responsible for most of the terrorists, murderers and rapists being allowed tocontinue with their evil.
No matter how many chat rooms there are, the one where people are not supposed to be sexual will be the place where those who intend to shock and upset folks will appear, and those who can't quite own, to themselves, whatever sexual interest they find in nudism.
How about just one chat room for paid members only?A few thoughts:It would reduce the attractiveness of the site. The attractive aspects of the site include that there are large numbers about. If you do not like the chat room leave. It is the internet, all you have to do is accept it is a public space and there is very little in the way of entry controls. The same issue happens on some beaches, people doing all sorts of stuff in the dunes is quite common. The swinger site is there and used a lot. Since it exists just refer people to that if they are outrageous..Also it would not solve the problem. I do find it interesting though that I have seen people get uptight about "TRUE nudist" what ever that means and then seen the same people with the same user name on TS having a tug on camera. I wonder if they are so inclined to behave on beaches? In short there is a deal of hypocrisy about.Another thing I have noticed is a number who seem to get on forums and indulge in self-righteous priggery, including trying to shout down discussion on the sex and sexuality board.If you open up a chat and it goes sexual you have a choice to either say no or not.If there is a possibility of a meet i want to know what the expectations and agenda is. To that extent id some one says they are bi or whatever useful. It is not realistic to insist that sexuality is unimportant and has no place in nudism. It has a place in normal social life. if you are gay you do not want to socialise, in all likelihood with homophobes. If you are disturbed by gay or bi people again you need to avoid them socially.Information and as much openness as can be managed is good. I want more not less. In the past I have met someone who assumed that sex would be available and been placed in the unexpected and uncomfortable position of being groped as soon as I got naked. This on a coffee and chat meet with a man slightly older than me who insisted he was straight in chats beforehand. If he had raised the issue that he was into a bit of male action we could have dealt with the issue ahead of time and laid out expectations. Final thought, there are cultural differences about. A dominant few seem to assume the American culture is universal. This is apparent even if they challenge the rules. I have seen cultural differences in the UK as well. Have you noticed that the Scottish Naked Bike rides were not allowed to be totally naked? The attitude there is that it would be shocking. In England it is seen as a bit of a laugh.so please people, more information and some tolerance please.