Free Style Nudity

A group for those who want to be nude on their own terms - without the hassles and rules of organised and commercialised nudism and naturism. It is a forum for discussion and exchange of information, with the aim of allowing more people to "do it their own way".Photos are allowed so please add lots of them - they make for a lively group. For confidentiality I have set it so that only...

Silly Things on True Nudists

Return to Discussions

How about a light-hearted look at how the management of TN keep getting things wrong, contradict themselves and generally make themselves look inconsistent and stupid?
Pamela

This topic was edited
Definition of "Clothed"


Profile Photo Classified by TN mods as "Clothed"
Pamela

This post was edited
RE: Definition of "Clothed"

This one is defined as Nude
And this one (below)is defined as Clothed. Well at least the free members get to see it.Actually it's the only one classed as clothed. But there are quite a few nude ones without my bits showing

This post was edited
How about this one? Should I have been locked up?

Profile Photo Classified by TN mods as "Clothed"PamelaSorry Pamela this is clothed, she has a thong on
Thanks for the post, nice-natural. You are absolutely right - the only thing I would say is that seen from behind my thong hides absolutely nothing that could be considered anatomically sexual, except possibly a potential view of my labia which might dangle down a little between my legs.
I do have a new example, which really has me thinking:

Me Out for a Walk in a Public Park - approved by TN moderator and classified as "Nude"

I think you would agree that I am not nude in this one either, but maybe the TN moderator took the view that I might as well be nude. and classified accordingly.
I didn't realise until I saw the photos how clearly my breasts and nipples were showing through my tee shirt - I love wearing tee shirts and I hate wearing bras, but I did get to wondering whether this was too much exposure in a public space.
For US members remember this is in Europe which is (generally) much more liberal and relaxed than the USA.
Anyone think i should have been locked up?
Pamela

This post was edited
RE: How about this one? Should I have been locked up?

Thanks for the post, nice-natural. You are absolutely right - the only thing I would say is that seen from behind my thong hides absolutely nothing that could be considered anatomically sexual, except possibly a potential view of my labia which might dangle down a little between my legs.I do have a new example, which really has me thinking:Me Out for a Walk in a Public Park - approved by TN moderator and classified as "Nude"I think you would agree that I am not nude in this one either, but maybe the TN moderator took the view that I might as well be nude. and classified accordingly.I didn't realise until I saw the photos how clearly my breasts and nipples were showing through my tee shirt - I love wearing tee shirts and I hate wearing bras, but I did get to wondering whether this was too much exposure in a public space.For US members remember this is in Europe which is (generally) much more liberal and relaxed than the USA.Anyone think i should have been locked up?PamelaMy wife used to wear a shirt like that a lot. She knew I liked it. I had a photo of her in a shirt like that made into a poster and it still hangs in my office.

Davesmooth - I think you might guess my next suggestion - why not post the photo of your wife on here? Ask her first!!
Pamela

This post was edited
RE: Silly Things on True Nudists

I've had at least two pics refused that, frankly, I thoughtwere pretty tame. No erection, no suggestive pose, not erotic...by my view. I'm a reasonably modest fellow, and the refusal came as a bigsurprise.

This post was edited
RE: Silly Things on True Nudists

It's funny, I see profile pics that are full ass or boob shots and they remove my post of my wife on anaked beach withouther face......

This post was edited
RE: Silly Things on True Nudists

They are strict on the "no face - no genitals" rule. Asses and tits don't count so they are allowed.
Oops this one would count.

This post was edited
Are you really sure about that, Olly?

They are strict on the "no face - no genitals" rule. Asses and tits don't count so they are allowed.Have you seen my current approved profile photo?

No tits, sure! Asses (by the way, the word is arse, an ass is a donkey) - I think I see one, replete with an anus and, close by, a slightly gaping vagina. Maybe they don't count either because they are an intrinsic part of an arse photo.
Pamela

This post was edited
RE: Are you really sure about that, Olly?

Whatever the case, looking good Pam;) If only my beach was your beach......

This post was edited
RE: Are you really sure about that, Olly?

You have a talent Pamela for showing just about every part of you without a face. You must be the exception that proves the rule (as my English teacher used to say).

This post was edited