Liberals, Lefties And Assorted Drop
A group for those who try to "live and let live". For those who have an alternative lifestyle and for those who don't. For those who "swing" and for those who don't. For those who don't get annoyed with people who are different, or try to convert them to conservatism. For those who don't care what religion or color you are, or who you voted for. Where size, age...
- created by RobRoy
Prudists
Return to DiscussionsYesterday I started a group called "Erotic Nudists". The intro made it quite plain that this site's rules must be obeyed, that there were to be no erotic photos, no attempts to find models, no chat-ups, in fact nothing sexual.
Within a short time there were ten members, including two couples and a singel female. At which point I went to bed.
Today the "moderators" have deleted the group. No warning, message to say why, no communication at all.
It would appear that only Tea Party conservatives who never have sex and go to church every sunday are welcomed here.
True Nudists? Nah, true Prudists.
Don't forget that we are guests of TT1. TT1 has made it clear that we are to avoid anything that could associate nudity with sex. Since a group called "Erotic Poetry" had been deleted in the past, it's only logical that yours would be deleted as well.
I know this doesn't make you feel better, but if I may make a suggestion: Now that people know you havethis interest, and you have probably already had contact with them, why not do something outsidethis site? I'm sure there are people who would join you there. It's just a matter of finding theright place.
Remember, if we were in a nudistsetting, we wouldn't want people having sex right in front of our eyes. The analogy is the same when it comes to this site. So, let's be responsible nudists and find other places for the erotic aspect.
I don't see why I need to be "grateful" as well as paying $40 for the privelage.
More to the point, I would not belong to a group called "Nude Republicans" or "Naked KK Klan members " because it's quite obvious that they're not going to be my sort of people. So if people see a group with the word "erotic" in the title... they can simply chose to ignore it. Otherwise it's a bit like the local do-gooders who go onto a beach marked "clothing optional" and complain about all the naked bodies!
My (now deleted) discussion site had clear and concise rules that none of the conditions of Truenudists could be breached yet, it seems, that there are still people who are happy to look at naked bodies but will only have sex with the lights out.
I don't see why I need to be "grateful" as well as paying $40 for the privelage. More to the point, I would not belong to a group called "Nude Republicans" or "Naked KK Klan members " because it's quite obvious that they're not going to be my sort of people. So if people see a group with the word "erotic" in the title... they can simply chose to ignore it. Otherwise it's a bit like the local do-gooders who go onto a beach marked "clothing optional" and complain about all the naked bodies! My (now deleted) discussion site had clear and concise rules that none of the conditions of Truenudists could be breached yet, it seems, that there are still people who are happy to look at naked bodies but will only have sex with the lights out.
The rules are clear: https://www.truenudists.com/forum/viewthread.php?id=2. You don't have to like them, but if you want to interact on this site, you have to follow them. This applies to paidmembers as well as to non-paying members (like me).
Note also that there is nothing in the rules which prohibit talk about politics, racism or anything else.Wecan even affirm that we are NOT asexual. And, indeed, we should.But even the most sexualTRUE nudist knows that there is a place and time for everything. Given the rules and "case law," it's obvious that posts of sexual connotation, even if innocently conceived, are not welcome here.
Remember that this site is supposed tobe a sitefor nudists to interact in a nudist way. Bringing the erotic element into this turns it into something it wasn't meant to be. We want people to see nudism for what it is, not for what theythink it is.
Furthermore, even if people under 18 can't join, that doesn't stop them from exploring the site. No matter how young orhow old, we want people to get the true nudist feel of it.
We prefer to keep our private activities exactly that: PRIVATE. In social settings, we behave. If that makes us prudes, then so be it!
Somewhere within the confines of this site it says no erections, etc., yet many members ( pardon the pun ) show just that!
SO given that you know that is against this sites ToS, report them for ignoring the agreed rules!! Surely thats what being a responsible member of any 'community' involves??
I really believe that if you are a paying member you do get a bit more freedom in that. It is another reason I have more to NudistSpace.org, and NudistPool.com as they are far more realistic about things, and free, and have clubs covering any situation, from eroticism, to less sexual matters.
Well surely thats what diversity, choice & democracy, commerce & the net are all about...? Each to thier own: If youre seeking something & this [or any other] site doesnt provide it, go somwhere which does-even if it is far more commercial& charges a fee!