Male Bonding2
For those who like to explore the concept and dynamics of male bonding. Men are socialized in different ways in different societies, and so many men would like to have close male friendships, yet after spending time establishing a career, primary relationship and live in general, find themselves without close male friends. Many of us want male friends with whom we can share openly without...
- created by AZdesertman
getting an erection while naked bonding
Return to DiscussionsIt's happened to me during naked yoga and if you don't make anything of it, it just goes away. It's totally natural, if you ask me. Comes and goes. It happened while doing partner work and you just move your erection around so it's not in the way and it's fine.
Another quote from Wikipedia
"From the ages of three to seven, the following behaviors are normal among children:Children are curious about where babies come from.Children may explore other children's and adults' bodies out of curiosity.By age four, children may show significant attachment to the opposite-sex parent.Children begin to have a sense of learned modesty and of the differences between private and public behaviors.For some children, genital touching increases, especially when they are tired or upset."
This does not say that children are sexual or interested in sex. They may be curious about bodies and physical health but that does not mean that they want to have sex. To a child, genital touching is about like thumb sucking, it's mildly pleasurable but is not sexual because their bodies don't have enough hormones to make it sexual.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_erection
"...observed in the corpses of men who have beenexecuted..."
First of all:This erection occurred at the moment of death. It doesn't mean that "dead people get an erection".And it doesn't say much about the nature of a normal erection, does it?
@bejjinks: Is at just a coincidence that erections most of occur when men are subject to sexual stimulation?
I may have been wrong about the panic thing but my point was that the coincidence between erections and sexual stimulation is because in a lot of cases, the erection causes the sexual stimulation. Saying that two things tend to occur at the same time does not say which of the two things caused the other.
Another quote from Wikipedia"From the ages of three to seven, the following behaviors are normal among children:Children are curious about where babies come from.Children may explore other children's and adults' bodies out of curiosity.By age four, children may show significant attachment to the opposite-sex parent.Children begin to have a sense of learned modesty and of the differences between private and public behaviors.For some children, genital touching increases, especially when they are tired or upset."This does not say that children are sexual or interested in sex. They may be curious about bodies and physical health but that does not mean that they want to have sex. To a child, genital touching is about like thumb sucking, it's mildly pleasurable but is not sexual because their bodies don't have enough hormones to make it sexual.
That article doesn't say that children are NOT sexual.
Did you get your "degree in psychology" from reading Wikipedia?
You don't even seem to know what sex is. Do you think that sex is the same as copulating? I've got news for you, I remember the sexual excitement I was feeling myself in certain situations when I was about five years old. Quite different from now, but nevertheless very sexual.
I did not say "all dead people get erections." I said "dead people get erections" and I was to correct my statement, I would add the word "Even". I would say "Even dead people get erections."
This is my last reply to you, since you've already occupied far too much space with your fairytales from The Institute Of Psychology in Wonderland:
Yes, you said "dead people get erections" which is something totally different than "dying people get erections". A cooling corpse don't get an erection.
That article doesn't say that children are NOT sexual.Did you get your "degree in psychology" from reading Wikipedia?You don't even seem to know what sex is. Do you think that sex is the same as copulating? I've got news for you, I remember the sexual excitement I was feeling myself in certain situations when I was about five years old. Quite different from now, but nevertheless very sexual.
Maybe I am defining sexual as copulating. I'm saying that little kids are not interested in copulating. I'm also defining sexual as hormonal. Little kids don't have the hormonal floods.
Are you defining sexual as anything that is related to the genitals? Do you define peeing as sexual since it comes from the penis? I'm not denying that you may have felt pleasure when you were five years old but was that pleasure sexual and by whose definition? Are you saying that at five, you wanted to or were capable of seducing someone?
My reason for saying that little kids are not sexual is to say that little kids don't seduce grown ups.
No I did not get my degree from Wikipedia. Wikipedia is just a handier reference than having to quote and cite scientific journals.
I did not say "all dead people get erections." I said "dead people get erections" and I was to correct my statement, I would add the word "Even". I would say "Even dead people get erections."
This is my last reply to you, since you've already occupied far too much space with your fairytales from The Institute Of Psychology in Wonderland:
Yes, you said "dead people get erections" which is something totally different than "dying people get erections". A cooling corpse don't get an erection.So argue technicalities with me and tell me that a man who dies a violent death experiences sexual stimulation that causes his erection.
You're missing the point. The point wasn't about dead people and erections. The point was that erections happen without requiring sexual stimulation.
And saying "your fairytales from The Institute Of Psychology in Wonderland" means that you've run out of intelligent things to say.