Nudists Who Want Anti-Nudism Laws C
A group for those of us who want to have anti-nudism laws in our areas or states overturned or changed!
- created by DMK1984
Unlikely Allies...?
Return to DiscussionsKeep an note of those around you whom object to compulsory face coverings. When (or if) this pandemic blows over, perhaps they could be persuaded to come over to our side, if not at least have a live-and-let-live attitude or point out the outright hypocrisy of their position.
Bill Gates On Anti-Maskers: "What Are These, Like Nudists?"
Who knew there were so many doctors and scientists and health professionals on TrueNudists?
Wish I could find such a doctor for my primary care physician. Use to have a doctor who was totally ok with nudity in the examination room. And I mean absolutely comfortable with it. Totally relaxed. Nudity was a total non-issue.
Unfortunately, he quit private practice to work in a nursing home. Damn him, anyway.
Have been seen since by several doctors who are total gymnophobes. "OMG! OMG! OMG! It's a naked person. OMG!"
But just recently remembered that I had been seen by another doctor who was totally relaxed and comfortable with nudity. Will see him again later this week -- but not for a physical exam. I stopped seeing him because I couldn't stand his office staff. However, I decided that if they give me any trouble this time, I'm just going to document it in a letter and send it to the doctor.
As one example, I couldn't get through their automated phone system, no matter which button a pushed (and I tried all of them) it said it was an invalid response. Sent them an electronic message explaining the situation -- that I could NOT get through to the office by phone. Their response? "Please call our office." And that's just one example.
However, if this doctor is still relaxed and comfortable with nudity, I can deal with the office staff.
I cant believe the number of people who think the govt has our best interest in mind when they paid for the creation of this virusFACT!
Dr Fraudci just in 2015 wrote a paper on the ineffectiveness of mask for viral respiratory diseases and the detriment masks contributed to more deaths during the 1918 Spanish flu. Also, Drs have made it clear we dont need masks for flu season with an average of 80k die from each year or the 1.5 mil that dies from tuberculosis each year and no one says a word about masks. If you think for a second that masks affect spread youre too gullible.
No. Not at all. Because it's when you actually look at all of the data that it becomes clear that masks don't make any appreciable difference. It's only when you only consider the data that agrees with your desired conclusion that you can make any sort of case in support of the use of masks. That's the definition of cherry picking.
Or Vitamin D
A person can use red string to imply cause & effect to any two things.
HIV acts a lot like feline leukemia. Spicy food disrupts the digestion. Zinc stunts growth while GMO papaya initiates premature puberty.
Take any two things & someone will find a way to connect them... even if there is only a tangential connection.
Based on the work done by people who I pay tax dollars to do this work, COVID-19 is not airborne, it's water borne. Any barrier between my wet lungs & water outside is good. The body knows this - mucus. But when mucus isn't enough, as with some viruses, cloth works too because while the virus might be small enough to pass between the fibers, the water droplet is not.