Tracy And Dans Nudist Group
group who are friends of Dan and Tracy, if your not a friend then you will NOT be accepted
- created by Tracydan
Double standard?
Return to DiscussionsNot that this matters nor will it a make a difference but as you look thru profiles have you ever noticed that if a woman submits a questionable picture its no problem, but if a man submits one it is rejected, We are nudists, dont really care what you wish to submit and share but just a observation
T&D
My husband reposted a picture of himself this morning and it was almost immediately removed. It did not even show "everything". The part that makes no sense is that he had the same photo up a week or so ago and they had no problem with it then. He just added another picture that He says is "sanitized". The other thing that seems so inconsistent is that almost every "guy" photo I've seen on here is far more revealing than the one that TN took down!
I've taken my plane up nude a few times, and once actually remembered my camera, took a few selfies. It's not wide angle, and I couldn't aim it accurately, but nonetheless...
Submitted a pic that showed my torso and also the yoke and fuel selector valve, but it was rejected.
Most definitely a double standard going on here. I can understand the policing of photos because some people here are not really nudist but rather just perverts but the women seem to get a little more latitude. I have had full body photos rejected I assume because my penis was dangling too low maybe? I don't know exactly why but when the picture was snapped I wasn't thinking about the length of my penis. Rather odd criteria they judge by.
I don't understand either, I don't think your a real nudist if you don't show all, I do understand why the guys that are always masturbating on cam are censored and cut off, that to me is not what being a nudist is about and they should be perminately banned and the guys that are in a natural state left along.
I have raised concerns about some of the pictures I've uploaded to my profile gallery, from time to time. What's been explained to me and I believe it, is that there are literally hundreds and hundreds of photos being uploaded daily. Too many to count are deleted due to content. The rules are there and many of those posting pictures of themselves or from the internet to their profile galleries are obviously not reading and adhering to the rules for posting pics.
Another reason some make the cut and other don't ... with so many pictures being uploaded, the owners/Administrators have solicited help from people they trust to carry out their requirements for photos being approved or denied. Not all people think the same and what the owners may feel is okay, these other photo Mods may not. It may seem double standard but in many cases, as I've learned, it was the call of a photo Mod and not the owners. It is the nature of the beast.
It's imperative that members read the photo rules and scrutinize their photos from an admins/photo Mods view. If there is still question why it was deleted or not approved, contact the owners and politely ask for an explanation. Be patient and prepared to wait a while for a response. I suspect there are many, many members asking for clarification and the owners do have day jobs!
Not that this matters nor will it a make a difference but as you look thru profiles have you ever noticed that if a woman submits a questionable picture its no problem, but if a man submits one it is rejected, We are nudists, dont really care what you wish to submit and share but just a observationT&D
I've actually had the opposite happen with photos I've posted and photos I've seen that are allowed ... men vs women. Guys submit photos of themselves in obvious spread eagle positions. I've uploaded photos of women in positions that are not nearly as spread eagle and they've not been approved.
I offered my services to be a photo Mod when the site made the change over. There were 14 of us photo Mods. There was no way for us to all agree and be consistent with photos we were asked to allow or deny. I used the communications I had with TT2 as a gauge to moderate the photos. Many photos slipped by, by those temp Mods that felt those types of photos were fine.
So ... I've actually had the opposite with regards to photos of women with their legs slightly opened and not being approved and men with obvious spread eagle photos being approved. It's all perception of that person given the task of photo Moderator and the owners prerogative.
Ahh, maybe ... no standards and consistency!
I was told that there are a few here that are Photo Mods. They look over the pictures that are downloaded and decide whether or not they can remain or get deleted. I've uploaded some pretty tame photos and they've been deleted. I've complained to TT2 and she's asked me to resubmit and then they are approved. Only explanation ... one or all of the other photo Mods aren't following the rules for photo uploads and deciding on their own who gets to upload what and what kind of photos are okay and are not. It's not consistent.