The perfect girl - Part 2

In theory, I would expect three things to happen: 1. Scarcity creates value. 2. The extremes are not loved. 3. Proportions matter more than numbers. Do they verify?

1. Scarcity. Let's look at the average height and breast size.

Women's average height varies considerably, they are taller in the Northern part of the world, for reasons which I will not discuss here. It seems that you find the tallest ladies in the Netherlands and Montenegro (1.70m) and the shortest (1.51m) in Guatemala. I have never been to Guatemala, but for Montenegro and the Netherlands I can confirm: people are very tall, far taller than the French. At 1.80m (1.79m at a different measurement) I'm just a regular gal there. For reference, average ladies' height is 1.66m in Germany, 1.64m in France and the UK and 1.63m in the US.

So if scarcity creates value, one would expect men in the Northern part of the world to like shorter girls (tall girls are dime a dozen) and the other way round. This would not necessarily have led to an averaging out, because it's not only about what guys prefer but also about what they can get their hands on. About what is available.

Evidence for this is scarce. Do you guys fantasize about a tiny little girl? Well, ok, I'm sure you do sometimes, but how often? Small is beautiful. Each time I travel in some Asian countries or regions, say Thailand or Bali, I am so impressed by the natural grace of the girls. When a waitress serves you your drink, with those lovely gestures, with those small, beautiful elegant hands put together, wow. Excuse my French, but if I were a guy I would likely get a hard on. Plus, you guys must have a bit of a protective streak and small needs protection. And also, small girls are so much easier to manipulate in bed, everything looks bigger with a small girl etc.

On the other hand, all propaganda is about tall girls. Fashion girls are tall (OK, fashion is about clothes, not girls but still), a girl my size will always attract more attention than one 20 cm shorter... I was very self-conscious about my height in my teens, I was attracting too much attention, but now I'm fine with it, and would I choose to be 1.60m instead? Probably not.

So, I don't know. My take would be that this assumption is only partly true, you guys would rather have a small girl in your bed but would rather take me to a fancy restaurant. Am I right?

Let's take breasts. Boobs. There is a lot of confusion because there are 6 different systems of measuring them. For example, the US size 34C corresponds to the UK size 34D and the EU size 75D and it is 90D in France and 12C in Australia. But I'll take the most international one and cup only, between AA and DD.

Average cup size seemingly varies from AA in several south-Eastern Asian countries to C-D in Scandinavian ones and even D in Iceland. Wow. I need to move to Iceland, I have always been a bit complexed about my C-D cups and there I would be a small-breasted girl! While in France the average is A-B, in UK it is B-C and in the US it's C. Now, who went around the globe to measure the breasts of thousand of girls? I want that job - and I'm sure you guys also do.

So do guys in the Northern hemisphere prefer smaller, A-B cups? My impression is that yes, they do. At least judging by the guys on this site, and they must be quite knowledgeable, being nudists and having seen thousands of (non dissimulated) pairs. Unless the lady is in her teens, a pair of D cups will sag more than a pair of B cups and also guys here are a bit older than the average and small looks younger so... Do guys in Southern Asia like D cups? Honestly, by the looks I get when I travel there I would say that yes, they do. They also like tall, white haired blond girls, so one more argument in favour of my scarcity-creates-value theory.

I will pass quickly over the nature-abhores-extremes theory, which I think is valid. Would you guys take home a 2m or a 1.4m tall girl? Sorry, I'll rephrase, of course you would. Most of you would take any good looking girl if you were not married and she accepted. Would you guys prefer a 2m or 1.4m tall girl over one just as pretty of a more average height? I don't think you would. But also interestingly, would you take me to your bedroom or my (imaginary) twin sister who is 1.64m tall? Ok, you would take us both, but if you can only choose one, who would that be? I bet I would lose that context to my sister. OK, I occasionally (very rarely) wear platforms which bring me at around 2.03m. but that is more carnival-like than for seduction. Wear those in a crowded place and most guys' nose will be level with my boobs so I'll never be looked in the eyes and guys will get closer and more intimate than absolutely necessary.

Also, I would expect that most of you would choose neither AA cups nor DDs if given the choice? Still, why do all sex dolls and personal AI girlfriends have DDs? Maybe for teenagers?

Now, what about proportions? I would expect that most of you would like proportionally long legs and neck, irrespective of their actual size in cm? That you would find A boobs underwhelming on my big frame and C cups overwhelming on a 1.40m tall girl?

There is also a question about the hourglass figure. Much despised in fashion, but still statistics show than men like it. That the ideal waist to hips ratio, according to preferences formulated by many thousands men, would be 0.7. Happy to report that I got that. Ok, in summer, when I lose a couple of kilos it's more like 0.69, so my butt is a bit too big but hey. It could be worse.

So my take is that a 1.70m tall girl (a bit over average in most countries) with proportionally long legs and neck, small waist, 0.7 waist to hip ratio and B (or B-C) cups (and of course, pretty face, nice personality, blabla, blabla...) would be the ideal girl for most of you.

Would you agree with this conclusion?

• Flag
• Edit
• Delete
• Quote
• Reply